![]() I think TPR is great if you need to relearn the majority of the content. I learn best when the overall picture is presented to me and know why things happen. The Physics book is kinda convoluted, HOWEVER for everything else I liked TPR. TPR gives you more info than you need to know but they will tell you when you don’t need to memorize it. ![]() Loved them both, think they are both really good at what they are trying to accomplish (PR is very comprehensive, EK is very efficient) and they complimented each other well. from scratch), and then used ExamKrackers for every subject to tighten up my performance. I used Princeton Review for the subjects I needed a total review on (i.e. Take this from someone who used to suck at CARS and got a negative reading score on the SAT lol. I have done most of the TPR workbook and have yet to find an answer that I got wrong where I didn’t agree with their reasoning. In trying to write difficult questions many third party companies just end up writing flawed questions. The logic is simple/short exactly like the AAMC. TPR is also better in my opinion than other companies for CARS because they don’t have you make like 9 inferences to get an answer. It helped me improve in CARS a lot, although there were other factors like attitude and reading leisurely which I think helped me more. ![]() The TPR CARS workbook is very good in my opinion. They could have gone in more depth on molecular biology and genetic processes since that seems to be a very high yield on the B/B section. It’s not too tough to read through and it keeps you engaged with little questions as you read through. I’ve gone through all of their books so far and found that one to be the most useful so far. Yeah, Princeton Review Biology is good enough. What 515+ testers say about Princeton Review The remaining topics in Biological Systems and Foundations such as general chemistry, organic chemistry, physics and biology cover all the material required for a maximum score. The actual information present in the Biochemistry sections is excellent, however there simply isn’t enough content to fully cover the Biochemistry part of the MCAT and obtain the maximum score.įortunately, TPR’s gap in Biochemistry can be easily filled with information from the “Free Materials” section of the article. TPR’s weakest section is the Biochemistry segment from Biological Systems and Foundations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |